« That's a Wellness App to You | Main | What Do You Get When You Combine a Highly Communicable Disease, Distrust of the Pharmaceutical Industry, and Fear of the Federal Government? »

April 19, 2019


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Interesting. But it is not so simple. This is because such surgeons, and every physician in fact, has a professional duty to catch up with new methods and researches, published in professional medical literature ( legal duty in fact). Now, part of duty to obtain informed consent from one patient, is to describe or offer, all other novel methods exist and practiced. It would be sufficient then, to fail in one surgery, harming the patient, while new novel method or practice had been ignored or not told to the patient, for being potentially liable in tort and negligence, and loosing in court simply. Briefly : one surgeon, has a clear duty, not to get stuck in old fashion methods or practice of course.

So, surgeon, may also consider legal outcome, and offer such experimental yet or new method, to one patient, and avoid potential law suit simply.


The comments to this entry are closed.